AMD Athlon 5350 vs AMD Athlon 64 FX-60

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 5350 and AMD Athlon 64 FX-60 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 5350

• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 90 nm
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 110 Watt
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1787 vs 709

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 FX-60

• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 912 vs 699

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon 5350
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 FX-60

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	699 912
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1787 709

Compare specifications (specs)