AMD Athlon 64 2000+ vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 2000+ and AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 2000+
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- 11.1x lower typical power consumption: 8 Watt vs 89 Watt
Launch date | June 2008 vs May 2006 |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 8 Watt vs 89 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- Around 100% higher clock speed: 2 GHz vs 1 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
Maximum frequency | 2 GHz vs 1 GHz |
L1 cache | 256 KB vs 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB vs 512 KB |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon 64 2000+
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Name | AMD Athlon 64 2000+ | AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+ |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 130 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 116 | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 195 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 356 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.912 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1.694 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.054 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 0.981 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon 64 2000+ | AMD Athlon 64 X2 4000+ | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Lima | Windsor |
Launch date | June 2008 | May 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 3309 | 3312 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 77 mm | 220 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 1 GHz | 2 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 2 |
Transistor count | 122 million | 154 million |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM2 | AM2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 8 Watt | 89 Watt |