AMD Athlon 64 FX-76 vs AMD Sempron 3800+
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 FX-76 and AMD Sempron 3800+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 FX-76
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
- Around 45% higher clock speed: 3.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Launch date | November 2006 vs October 2006 |
Number of cores | 2 vs 1 |
Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz vs 2.2 GHz |
L2 cache | 1024 KB vs 256 KB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Sempron 3800+
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 62 Watt vs 125 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 62 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon 64 FX-76
CPU 2: AMD Sempron 3800+
Name | AMD Athlon 64 FX-76 | AMD Sempron 3800+ |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 422 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 360 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon 64 FX-76 | AMD Sempron 3800+ | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Windsor | Manila |
Launch date | November 2006 | October 2006 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 3123 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $21 | |
Price now | $21 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.75 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 235 mm | 103 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 256 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 1 |
Transistor count | 227 million | 81 million |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | F | AM2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 62 Watt |