AMD Athlon 64 LE-1600 vs AMD Sempron 3800+

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 LE-1600 and AMD Sempron 3800+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 LE-1600

  • CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 38% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 62 Watt
  • Around 2% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 430 vs 422
  • Around 14% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 412 vs 360
Specifications (specs)
Launch date October 2007 vs October 2006
L2 cache 1024 KB vs 256 KB
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt vs 62 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 430 vs 422
PassMark - CPU mark 412 vs 360

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon 64 LE-1600
CPU 2: AMD Sempron 3800+

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
430
422
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
412
360
Name AMD Athlon 64 LE-1600 AMD Sempron 3800+
PassMark - Single thread mark 430 422
PassMark - CPU mark 412 360

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Athlon 64 LE-1600 AMD Sempron 3800+

Essentials

Architecture codename Windsor Manila
Launch date October 2007 October 2006
Place in performance rating 3102 3103
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $21
Price now $21
Value for money (0-100) 7.75

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 230 mm 103 mm
L1 cache 128 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 1024 KB 256 KB
Manufacturing process technology 90 nm 90 nm
Maximum frequency 2.2 GHz 2.2 GHz
Number of cores 1 1
Transistor count 227 million 81 million

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported AM2 AM2
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt 62 Watt