AMD Athlon 64 LE-1600 vs AMD Sempron 3800+
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 LE-1600 and AMD Sempron 3800+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 LE-1600
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 38% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 62 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 430 vs 422
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 412 vs 360
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | October 2007 vs October 2006 |
L2 cache | 1024 KB vs 256 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 62 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 430 vs 422 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 412 vs 360 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon 64 LE-1600
CPU 2: AMD Sempron 3800+
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Athlon 64 LE-1600 | AMD Sempron 3800+ |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 430 | 422 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 412 | 360 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon 64 LE-1600 | AMD Sempron 3800+ | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Windsor | Manila |
Launch date | October 2007 | October 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 3096 | 3104 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $21 | |
Price now | $21 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.75 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 230 mm | 103 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 256 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Transistor count | 227 million | 81 million |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM2 | AM2 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 62 Watt |