AMD Athlon 64 X2 5400+ BE vs Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon 64 X2 5400+ BE and Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 5400+ BE
- Around 75% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
| Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 65 Watt
| L2 cache | 4 MB vs 512 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Athlon 64 X2 5400+ BE | Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Brisbane | Merom |
| Launch date | February 2008 | 15 January 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 126 mm | |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 154 million | |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | |
| Number of threads | 2 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Sockets supported | AM2 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 20 Watt |