AMD Athlon II M300 vs AMD Opteron 840

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II M300 and AMD Opteron 840 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II M300

  • CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
  • Around 43% higher clock speed: 2 GHz vs 1.4 GHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 130 nm
  • 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 85 Watt
Launch date 10 September 2009 vs June 2003
Number of cores 2 vs 1
Maximum frequency 2 GHz vs 1.4 GHz
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm vs 130 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 85 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon II M300
CPU 2: AMD Opteron 840

Name AMD Athlon II M300 AMD Opteron 840
PassMark - Single thread mark 776
PassMark - CPU mark 670
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 236
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 447

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Athlon II M300 AMD Opteron 840

Essentials

Architecture codename Caspian SledgeHammer
Launch date 10 September 2009 June 2003
Place in performance rating 2958 not rated
Series AMD Athlon II
Vertical segment Laptop Server

Performance

64 bit support
Front-side bus (FSB) 3200 MHz
L1 cache 128 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 1024 KB 1024 KB
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm 130 nm
Maximum frequency 2 GHz 1.4 GHz
Number of cores 2 1
Number of threads 2
Die size 193 mm
Transistor count 106 million

Compatibility

Sockets supported Socket S1 (S1g3) 940
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 85 Watt
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1

Advanced Technologies

PowerNow