AMD Athlon II Neo K125 vs AMD Turion X2 RM-77

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II Neo K125 and AMD Turion X2 RM-77 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II Neo K125

• CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
• 65536x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 35 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Turion X2 RM-77

• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
• Around 35% higher clock speed: 2.3 GHz vs 1.7 GHz
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 735 vs 616
• Around 78% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 562 vs 315

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon II Neo K125
CPU 2: AMD Turion X2 RM-77

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	616 735
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	315 562

Compare specifications (specs)