AMD Athlon II Neo K325 vs AMD Phenom II X4 P920

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II Neo K325 and AMD Phenom II X4 P920 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II Neo K325

• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 25 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 P920

• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
• Around 23% higher clock speed: 1.6 GHz vs 1.3 GHz
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 597 vs 486
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1006 vs 417
• Around 40% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1029 vs 736
• 2.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2866 vs 1235

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon II Neo K325
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 P920

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	486 597
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	417 1006
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	736 1029
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	1235 2866

Compare specifications (specs)