AMD Athlon II X4 641 vs AMD FX-6200

Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon II X4 641 and AMD FX-6200 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon II X4 641

• Around 15% higher maximum core temperature: 70.10°C vs 61.10°C
• Around 78% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 125 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD FX-6200

• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
• 2 more threads: 6 vs 4
• Around 46% higher clock speed: 4.1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz
• Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1400 vs 1189
• Around 76% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 4075 vs 2313
• Around 39% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 513 vs 369
• Around 55% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1934 vs 1247

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Athlon II X4 641
CPU 2: AMD FX-6200

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1189 1400
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	2313 4075
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	369 513
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	1247 1934

Compare specifications (specs)