AMD Athlon X4 860K vs AMD FX-6100
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon X4 860K and AMD FX-6100 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon X4 860K
- Around 3% higher clock speed: 4 GHz vs 3.9 GHz
- Around 3% higher maximum core temperature: 72.40°C vs 70°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm SOI
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1528 vs 1316
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 531 vs 466
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.669 vs 0.606
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 4 GHz vs 3.9 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 72.40°C vs 70°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm SOI |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1528 vs 1316 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 531 vs 466 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.669 vs 0.606 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FX-6100
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
- 2 more threads: 6 vs 4
- 2.3x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3684 vs 3432
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1702 vs 1593
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.171 vs 4.868
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 15.905 vs 12.03
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.327 vs 0.22
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.915 vs 4.831
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 6 vs 4 |
| Number of threads | 6 vs 4 |
| L1 cache | 288 KB vs 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 6 MB vs 4 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3684 vs 3432 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1702 vs 1593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.171 vs 4.868 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.905 vs 12.03 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.327 vs 0.22 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.915 vs 4.831 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon X4 860K
CPU 2: AMD FX-6100
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Athlon X4 860K | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1528 | 1316 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3432 | 3684 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 531 | 466 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1593 | 1702 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.868 | 6.171 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 12.03 | 15.905 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.22 | 0.327 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.669 | 0.606 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.831 | 4.915 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Athlon X4 860K | AMD FX-6100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Family | AMD Athlon Processors | AMD FX-Series Processors |
| OPN Tray | AD860KXBI44JA | FD6100WMW6KGU |
| Place in performance rating | 2828 | 2847 |
| Series | AMD Athlon X4 | AMD FX 6-Core Black Edition Processors |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Architecture codename | Zambezi | |
| Launch date | October 2011 | |
| OPN PIB | FD6100WMGUSBX | |
| Price now | $299 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 5.30 | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 3.7 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 288 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 6 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm SOI |
| Maximum core temperature | 72.40°C | 70°C |
| Maximum frequency | 4 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 6 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 6 |
| Unlocked | ||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 315 mm | |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | |
| Transistor count | 1200 million | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Supported memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Sockets supported | FM2+ | AM3+ |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD Athlon X4 860K with others
AMDAthlon X4 860K vs
IntelPentium 4 2.53
AMDAthlon X4 860K vs
IntelCeleron 2.60
AMDAthlon X4 860K vs
AMDSempron X2 2200
AMDAthlon X4 860K vs
AMDAthlon X2 7750 BE
AMDAthlon X4 860K vs
IntelPentium G860
AMDAthlon X4 860K vs
AMDFX-6100
