AMD Athlon XP 2000+ vs AMD Athlon XP 2100+
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon XP 2000+ and AMD Athlon XP 2100+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon XP 2000+
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 62 Watt
| Launch date | September 2003 vs January 2001 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 62 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon XP 2100+
- Around 4% higher clock speed: 1.73 GHz vs 1.67 GHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 327 vs 311
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 210 vs 195
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 1.73 GHz vs 1.67 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 327 vs 311 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 210 vs 195 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon XP 2000+
CPU 2: AMD Athlon XP 2100+
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Athlon XP 2000+ | AMD Athlon XP 2100+ |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 311 | 327 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 195 | 210 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Athlon XP 2000+ | AMD Athlon XP 2100+ | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Thorton | Thoroughbred |
| Launch date | September 2003 | January 2001 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $25 | |
| Place in performance rating | 3243 | 3235 |
| Price now | $24.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 3.54 | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| Die size | 80 mm | 80 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 1.67 GHz | 1.73 GHz |
| Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
| Transistor count | 63 million | 37 million |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | A | A |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 62 Watt |
