AMD Athlon XP 2200+ vs AMD Athlon XP 2500+
Comparative analysis of AMD Athlon XP 2200+ and AMD Athlon XP 2500+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon XP 2200+
- CPU is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 63 Watt vs 68 Watt
Launch date | September 2003 vs February 2003 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 63 Watt vs 68 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon XP 2500+
- Around 2% higher clock speed: 1.83 GHz vs 1.8 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 353 vs 335
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 231 vs 214
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 1.83 GHz vs 1.8 GHz |
L2 cache | 512 KB vs 256 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 353 vs 335 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 231 vs 214 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Athlon XP 2200+
CPU 2: AMD Athlon XP 2500+
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Athlon XP 2200+ | AMD Athlon XP 2500+ |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 335 | 353 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 214 | 231 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Athlon XP 2200+ | AMD Athlon XP 2500+ | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Thorton | Barton |
Launch date | September 2003 | February 2003 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $85 | |
Place in performance rating | 3215 | 3200 |
Price now | $84.95 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.14 | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
Die size | 80 mm | 101 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 256 KB | 512 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 130 nm |
Maximum frequency | 1.8 GHz | 1.83 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Transistor count | 63 million | 63 million |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | A | A |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 63 Watt | 68 Watt |