AMD E-240 vs Intel Pentium SU4100

Comparative analysis of AMD E-240 and Intel Pentium SU4100 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E-240

• CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 15% higher clock speed: 1.5 GHz vs 1.3 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 45 nm
• 3.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 614 vs 174
• Around 86% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 557 vs 299

Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium SU4100

• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 18 Watt
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 527 vs 403
• 2.6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 501 vs 195

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E-240
CPU 2: Intel Pentium SU4100

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	403 527
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	195 501
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	614 174
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	557 299

Compare specifications (specs)