AMD E-240 vs AMD Phenom II X3 N830
Comparative analysis of AMD E-240 and AMD Phenom II X3 N830 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD E-240
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 45 nm
- Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 614 vs 271
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 11.462 vs 8.244
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 9 November 2010 vs 12 May 2010 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 45 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 614 vs 271 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 11.462 vs 8.244 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X3 N830
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 3 vs 1
- 2 more threads: 3 vs 1
- Around 40% higher clock speed: 2.1 GHz vs 1.5 GHz
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 828 vs 403
- 6.4x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1241 vs 195
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 688 vs 557
- 6.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.863 vs 0.298
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 3 vs 1 |
| Number of threads | 3 vs 1 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.1 GHz vs 1.5 GHz |
| L2 cache | 1536 KB vs 512 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 828 vs 403 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1241 vs 195 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 688 vs 557 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.863 vs 0.298 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD E-240
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X3 N830
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD E-240 | AMD Phenom II X3 N830 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 403 | 828 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 195 | 1241 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 614 | 271 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 557 | 688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.298 | 1.863 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 11.462 | 8.244 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.113 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.19 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD E-240 | AMD Phenom II X3 N830 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Zacate | Champlain |
| Launch date | 9 November 2010 | 12 May 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 3190 | 3192 |
| Series | AMD E-Series | 3x AMD Phenom II |
| Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 75 mm | |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1536 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 1.5 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Number of cores | 1 | 3 |
| Number of threads | 1 | 3 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 3600 MHz | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Sockets supported | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | S1 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 35 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
