AMD E1-2100 vs Intel Core i3-350M
Comparative analysis of AMD E1-2100 and Intel Core i3-350M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD E1-2100
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 3.9x lower typical power consumption: 9 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.547 vs 0.268
- 6.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.862 vs 0.585
- 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 9.251 vs 1.66
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 May 2013 vs 10 January 2010 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 32 nm |
| L2 cache | 1 MB vs 512 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.547 vs 0.268 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.862 vs 0.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.251 vs 1.66 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i3-350M
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 874 vs 323
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1083 vs 408
- 3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 324 vs 109
- 3.9x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 720 vs 183
- 12.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 20.244 vs 1.584
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.1 vs 0.04
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 874 vs 323 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1083 vs 408 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 324 vs 109 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 720 vs 183 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 20.244 vs 1.584 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.1 vs 0.04 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD E1-2100
CPU 2: Intel Core i3-350M
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD E1-2100 | Intel Core i3-350M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 323 | 874 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 408 | 1083 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 109 | 324 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 183 | 720 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.547 | 0.268 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1.584 | 20.244 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.04 | 0.1 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.862 | 0.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.251 | 1.66 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 311 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1098 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1840 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 311 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1098 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1840 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD E1-2100 | Intel Core i3-350M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Kabini | Arrandale |
| Family | AMD E-Series Processors | |
| Launch date | 23 May 2013 | 10 January 2010 |
| OPN Tray | EM2100CJ23HM | |
| Place in performance rating | 2884 | 3202 |
| Series | AMD E1-Series APU for Laptops | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Vertical segment | Laptop | Mobile |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $130 | |
| Price now | $44.05 | |
| Processor Number | i3-350M | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 12.65 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1 GHz | 2.26 GHz |
| Die size | 246 mm | 81 mm2 |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 90 °C | |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 1178 million | 382 million |
| Unlocked | ||
| Bus Speed | 2.5 GT/s DMI | |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 2500 MHz | |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | |
| L3 cache | 3072 KB | |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C for rPGA, 105°C for BGA | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.26 GHz | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| Supported memory types | Not Listed | DDR3 800/1066 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
Graphics |
||
| Enduro | ||
| Processor graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8210 | Intel HD Graphics |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Graphics base frequency | 500 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 667 MHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 667 MHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | FT3 | BGA1288, PGA988 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | rPGA 37.5mmx 37.5mm, BGA 34mmx28mm | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| VirusProtect | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD E1-2100 with others
AMDE1-2100 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T6570
AMDE1-2100 vs
AMDAthlon Neo X2 L325
AMDE1-2100 vs
AMDA4-3310MX
AMDE1-2100 vs
AMDA4-3305M
AMDE1-2100 vs
IntelCeleron 1047UE
AMDE1-2100 vs
IntelAtom C2558
