AMD E2-9000e vs Intel Celeron J4105
Comparative analysis of AMD E2-9000e and Intel Celeron J4105 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD E2-9000e
- Around 79900% higher clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 2.50 GHz
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 10 Watt
| Maximum frequency | 2000 MHz vs 2.50 GHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 10 Watt |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron J4105
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 722 vs 319
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 722 vs 319
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1384 vs 647
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1384 vs 647
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2229 vs 1406
- Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2229 vs 1406
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| L2 cache | 4 MB vs 1024 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 722 vs 319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 722 vs 319 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1384 vs 647 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1384 vs 647 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2229 vs 1406 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2229 vs 1406 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD E2-9000e
CPU 2: Intel Celeron J4105
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD E2-9000e | Intel Celeron J4105 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 319 | 722 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 319 | 722 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 647 | 1384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 647 | 1384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1406 | 2229 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1406 | 2229 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1085 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2891 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 412 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1365 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.374 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 30 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.261 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.281 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.947 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD E2-9000e | Intel Celeron J4105 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge | Gemini Lake |
| Family | AMD E2-Series for Notebooks | |
| Place in performance rating | 2653 | 2434 |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Launch date | 11 December 2017 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | |
| Price now | $107 | |
| Processor Number | J4105 | |
| Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor J Series | |
| Status | Launched | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.27 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1500 MHz | 1.50 GHz |
| L1 cache | 160 KB | |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB | 4 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2000 MHz | 2.50 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 1.2 billion | |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 14.9 GB/s | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-1866 | DDR4/LPDDR4 upto 2400 MT/s |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 600 MHz | 250 MHz |
| Number of pipelines | 128 | |
| Processor graphics | Radeon R2 series | Intel® UHD Graphics 600 |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Device ID | 0x3185 | |
| Execution Units | 12 | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 750 MHz | |
| Max video memory | 8 GB | |
Compatibility |
||
| Package Size | micro-BGA | 25mm x 24mm |
| Sockets supported | BGA (FT4) | FCBGA1090 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Thermal Solution | 105 deg C | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Integrated Wireless | Intel® Wireless-AC MAC | |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 6 | |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | |
| Number of USB ports | 8 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2 | |
| Total number of SATA ports | 2 | |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| MIPI-DSI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD E2-9000e with others
AMDE2-9000e vs
IntelCore i3-330UM
AMDE2-9000e vs
IntelCeleron N3050
AMDE2-9000e vs
IntelAtom Z3745D
AMDE2-9000e vs
AMDRX-216GD
AMDE2-9000e vs
AMDGX-420MC
