AMD EPYC 3201 vs AMD RX-427BB

Comparative analysis of AMD EPYC 3201 and AMD RX-427BB processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 3201

• CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
• 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 35 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD RX-427BB

• Around 16% higher clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 3100 MHz

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD EPYC 3201
CPU 2: AMD RX-427BB

Compare specifications (specs)