AMD EPYC 3201 vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U

Comparative analysis of AMD EPYC 3201 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 3201

• CPU is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
• Around 86011% higher clock speed: 3100 MHz vs 3.6 GHz
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 4x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 8545 vs 6660

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U

• 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1788 vs 1500

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD EPYC 3201
CPU 2: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1500 1788
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	8545 6660

Compare specifications (specs)