AMD EPYC 8024P vs AMD EPYC 7302P
Comparative analysis of AMD EPYC 8024P and AMD EPYC 7302P processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 8024P
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 5 nm vs 7 nm, 14 nm
- Around 72% lower typical power consumption: 90 Watt vs 155 Watt
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2371 vs 1893
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 Sep 2023 vs 7 Aug 2019 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt vs 155 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2371 vs 1893 |
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 7302P
- 8 more cores, run more applications at once: 16 vs 8
- 16 more threads: 32 vs 16
- Around 10% higher clock speed: 3.3 GHz vs 3 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 32690 vs 20556
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 16 vs 8 |
| Number of threads | 32 vs 16 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.3 GHz vs 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 1 MB vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB vs 32 MB (shared) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 32690 vs 20556 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD EPYC 8024P
CPU 2: AMD EPYC 7302P
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD EPYC 8024P | AMD EPYC 7302P |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2371 | 1893 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 20556 | 32690 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD EPYC 8024P | AMD EPYC 7302P | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 18 Sep 2023 | 7 Aug 2019 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $409 | $825 |
| Place in performance rating | 860 | 947 |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 | |
| OPN PIB | 100-100000049WOF | |
| OPN Tray | 100-000000049 | |
| Vertical segment | Server | |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.0 GHz |
| Die size | 73 mm² | |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | 128 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 75°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 3 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 8 | 16 |
| Number of threads | 16 | 32 |
| Transistor count | 8,875 million | |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max memory channels | 8 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 190.7 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 4 TB | |
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP | 70-100 Watt | |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Sockets supported | SP6 | SP3 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt | 155 Watt |
| Socket Count | 1P | |
Peripherals |
||
| PCIe configurations | Gen 5, 96 Lanes, (CPU only) | x16, x8 |
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 128 | |
| PCI Express revision | 4.0 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| AMD SenseMI | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
