AMD EPYC 8324P vs AMD EPYC 9124
Comparative analysis of AMD EPYC 8324P and AMD EPYC 9124 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 8324P
- CPU is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- 16 more cores, run more applications at once: 32 vs 16
- 32 more threads: 64 vs 32
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2097152x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2097152x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 200 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2367 vs 2309
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 Sep 2023 vs 10 Nov 2022 |
| Number of cores | 32 vs 16 |
| Number of threads | 64 vs 32 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) vs 1MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) vs 64MB (shared) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 200 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2367 vs 2309 |
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 9124
- Around 23% higher clock speed: 3.7 GHz vs 3 GHz
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 61825 vs 57127
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.7 GHz vs 3 GHz |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 61825 vs 57127 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD EPYC 8324P
CPU 2: AMD EPYC 9124
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD EPYC 8324P | AMD EPYC 9124 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2367 | 2309 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 57127 | 61825 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD EPYC 8324P | AMD EPYC 9124 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 18 Sep 2023 | 10 Nov 2022 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1895 | $1083 |
| Place in performance rating | 418 | 395 |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 2.65 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Die size | 4x 73 mm² | 4x 72 mm² |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB (shared) | 64MB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 75°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 3 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Number of cores | 32 | 16 |
| Number of threads | 64 | 32 |
| Transistor count | 35,500 million | 26,280 million |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5-4800 MHz, Twelve-channel |
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP | 155-225 Watt | 200-240 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Sockets supported | SP6 | SP5 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 200 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| PCIe configurations | Gen 5, 96 Lanes, (CPU only) | Gen 5, 128 Lanes, (CPU only) |
