AMD EPYC 9734 vs AMD EPYC 4484PX
Comparative analysis of AMD EPYC 9734 and AMD EPYC 4484PX processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 9734
- 100 more cores, run more applications at once: 112 vs 12
- 200 more threads: 224 vs 24
- 9.3x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 9.3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 130034 vs 51115
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 112 vs 12 |
| Number of threads | 224 vs 24 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) vs 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) vs 128 MB (shared) |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 130034 vs 51115 |
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 4484PX
- CPU is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 87% higher clock speed: 5.6 GHz vs 3 GHz
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 340 Watt
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 4251 vs 2369
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 May 2024 vs 13 Jun 2023 |
| Maximum frequency | 5.6 GHz vs 3 GHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 340 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 4251 vs 2369 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD EPYC 9734
CPU 2: AMD EPYC 4484PX
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD EPYC 9734 | AMD EPYC 4484PX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2369 | 4251 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 130034 | 51115 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD EPYC 9734 | AMD EPYC 4484PX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 13 Jun 2023 | 21 May 2024 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $9600 | $599 |
| Place in performance rating | 49 | 61 |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 2.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Die size | 8x 73 mm² | 2x 71 mm² |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 256 MB (shared) | 128 MB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 3 GHz | 5.6 GHz |
| Number of cores | 112 | 12 |
| Number of threads | 224 | 24 |
| Transistor count | 71,000 million | 17,840 million |
| Unlocked | ||
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 47°C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 89°C | |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP | 320-400 Watt | |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | SP5 | AM5 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 340 Watt | 120 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| PCIe configurations | Gen 5, 128 Lanes, (CPU only) | Gen 5, 28 Lanes, (CPU only) |
