AMD EPYC 9965 vs AMD EPYC 9684X
Comparative analysis of AMD EPYC 9965 and AMD EPYC 9684X processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 9965
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 96 more cores, run more applications at once: 192 vs 96
- 192 more threads: 384 vs 192
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 3 nm vs 5 nm
- 2.5x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 3190 vs 2897
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 185062 vs 148066
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Oct 2024 vs 13 Jun 2023 |
| Number of cores | 192 vs 96 |
| Number of threads | 384 vs 192 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 3 nm vs 5 nm |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) vs 1 MB (per core) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 3190 vs 2897 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 185062 vs 148066 |
Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 9684X
- 3x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 400 Watt vs 500 Watt
| L3 cache | 1152 MB (shared) vs 384 MB (shared) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt vs 500 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD EPYC 9965
CPU 2: AMD EPYC 9684X
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD EPYC 9965 | AMD EPYC 9684X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 3190 | 2897 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 185062 | 148066 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD EPYC 9965 | AMD EPYC 9684X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Launch date | 10 Oct 2024 | 13 Jun 2023 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $14813 | $14756 |
| Place in performance rating | 3 | 8 |
Performance |
||
| Base frequency | 2.25 GHz | 2.55 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 384 MB (shared) | 1152 MB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 3 nm | 5 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 3.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Number of cores | 192 | 96 |
| Number of threads | 384 | 192 |
| Unlocked | ||
| Die size | 12x 72 mm² | |
| Transistor count | 135,240 million | |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP | 450-500 Watt | 320-400 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
| Sockets supported | SP5 | SP5 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 500 Watt | 400 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| PCIe configurations | Gen 5, 128 Lanes, (CPU only) | Gen 5, 128 Lanes, (CPU only) |
