AMD FX-4100 vs AMD Phenom II X4 925
Comparative analysis of AMD FX-4100 and AMD Phenom II X4 925 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FX-4100
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- Around 36% higher clock speed: 3.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm SOI vs 45 nm
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 33% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1289 vs 1150
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2618 vs 2272
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 463 vs 357
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1286 vs 1147
- 3.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.203 vs 1.088
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.234 vs 0.197
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | October 2011 vs May 2009 |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Maximum frequency | 3.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm SOI vs 45 nm |
L2 cache | 4 MB vs 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 8 MB vs 6144 KB (shared) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1289 vs 1150 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2618 vs 2272 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 463 vs 357 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1286 vs 1147 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.203 vs 1.088 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.462 vs 10.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.234 vs 0.197 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 925
- 2.7x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 3.231 vs 2.939
Specifications (specs) | |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 192 KB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.231 vs 2.939 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD FX-4100
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 925
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD FX-4100 | AMD Phenom II X4 925 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1289 | 1150 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2618 | 2272 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 463 | 357 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1286 | 1147 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.203 | 1.088 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.462 | 10.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.234 | 0.197 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.51 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.939 | 3.231 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FX-4100 | AMD Phenom II X4 925 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Zambezi | Deneb |
Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
Launch date | October 2011 | May 2009 |
OPN PIB | FD4100WMGUSBX | |
OPN Tray | FD4100WMW4KGU | |
Place in performance rating | 2959 | 2968 |
Price now | $129.99 | $43.99 |
Series | AMD FX 4-Core Black Edition Processors | |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.22 | 22.90 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3.6 GHz | |
Die size | 315 mm | 258 mm |
L1 cache | 192 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 8 MB | 6144 KB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm SOI | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 70.50°C | |
Maximum frequency | 3.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Number of threads | 4 | |
P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.1 V - Max: 1.4125 V | |
Transistor count | 1200 million | 758 million |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3+ | AM3 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 95 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
PCI Express revision | n / a | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |