AMD FX-6100 vs AMD Phenom II X4 940 BE
Comparative analysis of AMD FX-6100 and AMD Phenom II X4 940 BE processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FX-6100
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
- Around 30% higher clock speed: 3.9 GHz vs 3 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm SOI vs 45 nm
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 33% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 125 Watt
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1316 vs 1213
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3688 vs 2358
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 466 vs 397
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1702 vs 1331
- Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.171 vs 3.763
- Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 15.905 vs 11.035
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.327 vs 0.192
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.915 vs 3.856
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | October 2011 vs January 2009 |
Number of cores | 6 vs 4 |
Maximum frequency | 3.9 GHz vs 3 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm SOI vs 45 nm |
L2 cache | 6 MB vs 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 8 MB vs 6144 KB (shared) |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1316 vs 1213 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3688 vs 2358 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 466 vs 397 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1702 vs 1331 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.171 vs 3.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.905 vs 11.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.327 vs 0.192 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.915 vs 3.856 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 940 BE
- Around 78% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 288 KB |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD FX-6100
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 940 BE
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD FX-6100 | AMD Phenom II X4 940 BE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1316 | 1213 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3688 | 2358 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 466 | 397 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1702 | 1331 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.171 | 3.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.905 | 11.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.327 | 0.192 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.606 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.915 | 3.856 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FX-6100 | AMD Phenom II X4 940 BE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Zambezi | Deneb |
Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
Launch date | October 2011 | January 2009 |
OPN PIB | FD6100WMGUSBX | |
OPN Tray | FD6100WMW6KGU | |
Place in performance rating | 2846 | 2867 |
Price now | $299 | |
Series | AMD FX 6-Core Black Edition Processors | |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.30 | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3.3 GHz | |
Die size | 315 mm | 258 mm |
L1 cache | 288 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 8 MB | 6144 KB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm SOI | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 70°C | |
Maximum frequency | 3.9 GHz | 3 GHz |
Number of cores | 6 | 4 |
Number of threads | 6 | |
Transistor count | 1200 million | 758 million |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3+ | AM3 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 125 Watt |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |