AMD FX-6100 vs AMD Phenom II X4 960T BE
Comparative analysis of AMD FX-6100 and AMD Phenom II X4 960T BE processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FX-6100
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
- 2 more threads: 6 vs 4
- Around 15% higher clock speed: 3.9 GHz vs 3.4 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm SOI vs 45 nm
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 33% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1317 vs 1302
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3691 vs 2370
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 466 vs 435
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1702 vs 1359
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.171 vs 4.563
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 15.905 vs 13.634
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.327 vs 0.224
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.606 vs 0.457
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | October 2011 vs June 2010 |
Number of cores | 6 vs 4 |
Number of threads | 6 vs 4 |
Maximum frequency | 3.9 GHz vs 3.4 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm SOI vs 45 nm |
L2 cache | 6 MB vs 2 MB |
L3 cache | 8 MB vs 6144 KB (shared) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1317 vs 1302 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3691 vs 2370 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 466 vs 435 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1702 vs 1359 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.171 vs 4.563 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.905 vs 13.634 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.327 vs 0.224 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.606 vs 0.457 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 960T BE
- Around 1% higher maximum core temperature: 71°C vs 70°C
- Around 78% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.98 vs 4.915
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum core temperature | 71°C vs 70°C |
L1 cache | 512 KB vs 288 KB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.98 vs 4.915 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD FX-6100
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 960T BE
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD FX-6100 | AMD Phenom II X4 960T BE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1317 | 1302 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3691 | 2370 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 466 | 435 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1702 | 1359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.171 | 4.563 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.905 | 13.634 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.327 | 0.224 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.606 | 0.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.915 | 4.98 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FX-6100 | AMD Phenom II X4 960T BE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Zambezi | Zosma |
Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | AMD Phenom |
Launch date | October 2011 | June 2010 |
OPN PIB | FD6100WMGUSBX | HD96ZTWFGRBOX |
OPN Tray | FD6100WMW6KGU | HD96ZTWFK4DGR |
Place in performance rating | 2845 | 2862 |
Price now | $299 | |
Series | AMD FX 6-Core Black Edition Processors | AMD Phenom II X4 Black |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.30 | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3.3 GHz | 3 GHz |
Die size | 315 mm | 346 mm |
L1 cache | 288 KB | 512 KB |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 2 MB |
L3 cache | 8 MB | 6144 KB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm SOI | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 70°C | 71°C |
Maximum frequency | 3.9 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
Number of cores | 6 | 4 |
Number of threads | 6 | 4 |
Transistor count | 1200 million | 904 million |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3+ | AM3 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 95 Watt |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |