AMD FX-6200 vs Intel Pentium E5300

Comparative analysis of AMD FX-6200 and Intel Pentium E5300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FX-6200

• CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 2
• Around 58% higher clock speed: 4.1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm SOI vs 45 nm
• 2.3x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1402 vs 1014
• 4.5x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 4085 vs 902
• Around 62% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 513 vs 316
• 3.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1934 vs 554

Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium E5300

• Around 21% higher maximum core temperature: 74.1°C vs 61.10°C
• Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 125 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD FX-6200
CPU 2: Intel Pentium E5300

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1402 1014
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	4085 902
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	513 316
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	1934 554

Compare specifications (specs)