AMD FX-6200 vs AMD Phenom II X4 970 BE
Comparative analysis of AMD FX-6200 and AMD Phenom II X4 970 BE processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FX-6200
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
- Around 17% higher clock speed: 4.1 GHz vs 3.5 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm SOI vs 45 nm
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 33% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 4075 vs 2739
- Around 17% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 513 vs 437
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1934 vs 1485
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.114 vs 1.62
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 15.71 vs 12.098
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.324 vs 0.204
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | February 2012 vs September 2010 |
Number of cores | 6 vs 4 |
Maximum frequency | 4.1 GHz vs 3.5 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm SOI vs 45 nm |
L2 cache | 6 MB vs 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 8 MB vs 6144 KB (shared) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 4075 vs 2739 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 513 vs 437 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1934 vs 1485 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.114 vs 1.62 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.71 vs 12.098 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.324 vs 0.204 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 970 BE
- Around 78% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1417 vs 1400
Specifications (specs) | |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 288 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1417 vs 1400 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD FX-6200
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 970 BE
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD FX-6200 | AMD Phenom II X4 970 BE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1400 | 1417 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 4075 | 2739 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 513 | 437 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1934 | 1485 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.114 | 1.62 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 15.71 | 12.098 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.324 | 0.204 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.845 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.445 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FX-6200 | AMD Phenom II X4 970 BE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Zambezi | Deneb |
Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
Launch date | February 2012 | September 2010 |
OPN PIB | FD6200FRGUBOX | |
OPN Tray | FD6200FRW6KGU | |
Place in performance rating | 2724 | 2714 |
Price now | $339.95 | |
Series | AMD FX 6-Core Black Edition Processors | |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.31 | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3.8 GHz | |
Die size | 315 mm | 258 mm |
L1 cache | 288 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 6 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 8 MB | 6144 KB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm SOI | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 61.10°C | |
Maximum frequency | 4.1 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
Number of cores | 6 | 4 |
Number of threads | 6 | |
P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.3 V - Max: 1.4125 V | |
Transistor count | 1200 million | 758 million |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3+ | AM3 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 125 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
PCI Express revision | n / a | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |