AMD FX-9590 vs AMD A6-3670K
Comparative analysis of AMD FX-9590 and AMD A6-3670K processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FX-9590
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
- Around 85% higher clock speed: 5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1811 vs 1147
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 6780 vs 2181
- Around 79% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 633 vs 354
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3042 vs 1154
- 13.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.765 vs 0.777
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.45 vs 0.435
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 8.59 vs 3.562
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | July 2013 vs December 2011 |
Number of cores | 8 vs 4 |
Maximum frequency | 5 GHz vs 2.7 GHz |
L2 cache | 8 MB vs 1024 KB (per core) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1811 vs 1147 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 6780 vs 2181 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 633 vs 354 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3042 vs 1154 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.765 vs 0.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.45 vs 0.435 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.59 vs 3.562 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A6-3670K
- Around 33% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 220 Watt
- 8.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 214.663 vs 25.735
- 7.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.542 vs 1.418
Specifications (specs) | |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 384 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 220 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 214.663 vs 25.735 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.542 vs 1.418 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD FX-9590
CPU 2: AMD A6-3670K
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD FX-9590 | AMD A6-3670K |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1811 | 1147 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 6780 | 2181 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 633 | 354 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3042 | 1154 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 3336 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.765 | 0.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 25.735 | 214.663 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.45 | 0.435 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.418 | 10.542 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 8.59 | 3.562 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FX-9590 | AMD A6-3670K | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Vishera | Llano |
Family | AMD FX-Series Processors | |
Launch date | July 2013 | December 2011 |
OPN PIB | FD9590FHHKWOF | |
OPN Tray | FD9590FHW8KHK | |
Place in performance rating | 2294 | 2272 |
Price now | $99.99 | |
Series | AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition Processors | |
Value for money (0-100) | 30.03 | |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 4.7 GHz | |
Die size | 315 mm | 228 mm |
L1 cache | 384 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 8 MB | 1024 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 8 MB | |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm SOI | 32 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 57°C | |
Maximum frequency | 5 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Number of threads | 8 | |
P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 V | |
Transistor count | 1200 million | 1178 million |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3+ | FM1 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt | 100 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
PCI Express revision | n / a | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |