AMD GX-420CA vs AMD E2-9000e

Comparative analysis of AMD GX-420CA and AMD E2-9000e processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD GX-420CA

• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
• 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
• Around 60% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 496 vs 319
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 496 vs 319
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 868 vs 647
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 868 vs 647

Reasons to consider the AMD E2-9000e

• 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 25 Watt
• Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1406 vs 773
• Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1406 vs 773

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD GX-420CA
CPU 2: AMD E2-9000e

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	CPU 1 CPU 2	496 319
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	CPU 1 CPU 2	496 319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	CPU 1 CPU 2	868 647
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	CPU 1 CPU 2	868 647
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	CPU 1 CPU 2	773 1406
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	CPU 1 CPU 2	773 1406

Compare specifications (specs)