AMD Mobile Sempron 210U vs AMD Turion 64 MT-30
Comparative analysis of AMD Mobile Sempron 210U and AMD Turion 64 MT-30 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Mobile Sempron 210U
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 90 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 299 vs 294
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 267 vs 246
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 January 2009 vs March 2005 |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm vs 90 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 299 vs 294 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 267 vs 246 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Turion 64 MT-30
- Around 7% higher clock speed: 1.6 GHz vs 1.5 GHz
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Maximum frequency | 1.6 GHz vs 1.5 GHz |
L2 cache | 1024 KB vs 256 KB |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Mobile Sempron 210U
CPU 2: AMD Turion 64 MT-30
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Mobile Sempron 210U | AMD Turion 64 MT-30 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 299 | 294 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 267 | 246 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Mobile Sempron 210U | AMD Turion 64 MT-30 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Launch date | 16 January 2009 | March 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 3239 | 3249 |
Series | AMD Mobile Sempron | Turion 64 |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Architecture codename | Lancaster | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Front-side bus (FSB) | 1600 MHz | 800 MHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 256 KB | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 1.5 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Number of threads | 1 | 1 |
Die size | 125 mm | |
Transistor count | 114 million | |
Compatibility |
||
Sockets supported | 812-ball BGA | 754 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
PowerNow |