AMD Opteron 152 vs AMD Opteron 154
Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron 152 and AMD Opteron 154 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 154
- Around 8% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 534 vs 487
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 457 vs 428
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz vs 2.6 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 534 vs 487 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 457 vs 428 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Opteron 152
CPU 2: AMD Opteron 154
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Opteron 152 | AMD Opteron 154 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 487 | 534 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 428 | 457 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Opteron 152 | AMD Opteron 154 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Venus | Venus |
Launch date | August 2005 | August 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 3028 | 2941 |
Vertical segment | Server | Server |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Transistor count | 106 million | 106 million |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | 939 | 939 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 104 Watt | 104 Watt |