AMD Opteron 150 vs AMD Opteron 152

Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron 150 and AMD Opteron 152 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.

AMD Opteron 150

AMD Opteron 152

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 150

Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 104 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt vs 104 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 152

Around 8% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
Around 3% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 487 vs 471
Around 9% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 428 vs 393

Specifications (specs)
Maximum frequency	2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark	487 vs 471
PassMark - CPU mark	428 vs 393

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Opteron 150
CPU 2: AMD Opteron 152

PassMark - Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

471

487

PassMark - CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

393

428

Name	AMD Opteron 150	AMD Opteron 152
PassMark - Single thread mark	471	487
PassMark - CPU mark	393	428

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Opteron 150	AMD Opteron 152
Essentials
Architecture codename	Venus	Venus
Launch date	August 2005	August 2005
Place in performance rating	3052	3038
Vertical segment	Server	Server
Performance
64 bit support
Die size	193 mm
L1 cache	128 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	1024 KB	1024 KB
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	90 nm
Maximum frequency	2.4 GHz	2.6 GHz
Number of cores	1	1
Transistor count	106 million	106 million
Compatibility
Max number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Sockets supported	939	939
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	85 Watt	104 Watt