AMD Opteron 150 vs AMD Opteron 152
Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron 150 and AMD Opteron 152 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 150
- Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 104 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 104 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 152
- Around 8% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 487 vs 471
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 428 vs 393
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 487 vs 471 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 428 vs 393 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Opteron 150
CPU 2: AMD Opteron 152
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Opteron 150 | AMD Opteron 152 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 471 | 487 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 393 | 428 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Opteron 150 | AMD Opteron 152 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Venus | Venus |
Launch date | August 2005 | August 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 3041 | 3027 |
Vertical segment | Server | Server |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 193 mm | |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 1024 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
Transistor count | 106 million | 106 million |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | 939 | 939 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt | 104 Watt |