AMD Opteron 150 vs AMD Opteron 152

Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron 150 and AMD Opteron 152 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 150

  • Around 22% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 104 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt vs 104 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 152

  • Around 8% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
  • Around 3% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 487 vs 471
  • Around 9% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 428 vs 393
Specifications (specs)
Maximum frequency 2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 487 vs 471
PassMark - CPU mark 428 vs 393

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Opteron 150
CPU 2: AMD Opteron 152

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
471
487
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
393
428
Name AMD Opteron 150 AMD Opteron 152
PassMark - Single thread mark 471 487
PassMark - CPU mark 393 428

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Opteron 150 AMD Opteron 152

Essentials

Architecture codename Venus Venus
Launch date August 2005 August 2005
Place in performance rating 3043 3028
Vertical segment Server Server

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 193 mm
L1 cache 128 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 1024 KB 1024 KB
Manufacturing process technology 90 nm 90 nm
Maximum frequency 2.4 GHz 2.6 GHz
Number of cores 1 1
Transistor count 106 million 106 million

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported 939 939
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt 104 Watt