AMD Opteron 242 vs Intel Pentium 4 HT 3.00

Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron 242 and Intel Pentium 4 HT 3.00 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Memory.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 242

  • 16x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
L1 cache 128 KB vs 8 KB
L2 cache 1024 KB vs 512 KB

Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium 4 HT 3.00

  • Around 88% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
  • Around 4% lower typical power consumption: 81.9 Watt vs 85 Watt
Maximum frequency 3 GHz vs 1.6 GHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 81.9 Watt vs 85 Watt

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Opteron 242 Intel Pentium 4 HT 3.00

Essentials

Architecture codename SledgeHammer Northwood
Launch date April 2003 April 2003
Place in performance rating not rated not rated
Vertical segment Server Desktop
Series Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor
Status Discontinued

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 193 mm 131 mm2
L1 cache 128 KB 8 KB
L2 cache 1024 KB 512 KB
Manufacturing process technology 130 nm 130 nm
Maximum frequency 1.6 GHz 3 GHz
Number of cores 1 1
Transistor count 106 million 55 million
Base frequency 3.00 GHz
Bus Speed 800 MHz FSB
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 70 °C

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported 940 478
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt 81.9 Watt
Low Halogen Options Available

Memory

Supported memory types DDR1, DDR2

Navigation

Choose a CPU

Compare processors

Compare AMD Opteron 242 with others

AMD Opteron 242 AMD
Opteron 242
vs Intel Pentium 4-M 2.50 Intel
Pentium 4-M 2.50
AMD Opteron 242 AMD
Opteron 242
vs Intel Pentium 4 HT 3.00 Intel
Pentium 4 HT 3.00
AMD Opteron 242 AMD
Opteron 242
vs AMD Opteron 244 AMD
Opteron 244