AMD Opteron 250 vs AMD Opteron 140

Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron 250 and AMD Opteron 140 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 250

  • CPU is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
  • Around 71% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 1.4 GHz
  • Around 64% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 649 vs 396
Specifications (specs)
Launch date May 2004 vs June 2003
Maximum frequency 2.4 GHz vs 1.4 GHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - CPU mark 649 vs 396

Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 140

  • Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 89 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 85 Watt vs 89 Watt

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Opteron 250
CPU 2: AMD Opteron 140

PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
649
396
Name AMD Opteron 250 AMD Opteron 140
PassMark - Single thread mark 0 0
PassMark - CPU mark 649 396

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Opteron 250 AMD Opteron 140

Essentials

Architecture codename SledgeHammer SledgeHammer
Launch date May 2004 June 2003
Launch price (MSRP) $12 $596
Place in performance rating 3247 3261
Price now $11 $710
Value for money (0-100) 17.41 0.16
Vertical segment Server Server

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 193 mm 193 mm
L1 cache 128 KB 128 KB
L2 cache 1024 KB 1024 KB
Manufacturing process technology 130 nm 130 nm
Maximum frequency 2.4 GHz 1.4 GHz
Number of cores 1 1
Transistor count 106 million 106 million

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported 940 940
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 89 Watt 85 Watt