AMD Opteron 250 vs AMD Opteron 248
Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron 250 and AMD Opteron 248 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 250
- CPU is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher clock speed: 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 649 vs 476
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | May 2004 vs November 2003 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 649 vs 476 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Opteron 250
CPU 2: AMD Opteron 248
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Opteron 250 | AMD Opteron 248 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 0 | 0 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 649 | 476 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Opteron 250 | AMD Opteron 248 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | SledgeHammer | SledgeHammer |
| Launch date | May 2004 | November 2003 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $12 | $12 |
| Place in performance rating | 3338 | 3351 |
| Price now | $11 | $99.95 |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.41 | 1.40 |
| Vertical segment | Server | Server |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 193 mm | 193 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB | 1024 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 1 | 1 |
| Transistor count | 106 million | 106 million |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | 940 | 940 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 89 Watt | 89 Watt |
