AMD Opteron 3365 vs AMD EPYC 7401P

Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron 3365 and AMD EPYC 7401P processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 3365

• Around 10% higher clock speed: 3.3 GHz vs 3 GHz
• 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 155/170 Watt
• 2.9x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 2048 vs 699

Reasons to consider the AMD EPYC 7401P

• Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
• 16 more cores, run more applications at once: 24 vs 8
• 40 more threads: 48 vs 8
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 32 nm
• 6x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• 8x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1731 vs 1132
• 7x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 28546 vs 4105
• Around 5% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 7285 vs 6931

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Opteron 3365
CPU 2: AMD EPYC 7401P

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	1132 1731
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	4105 28546
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	2048 699
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	6931 7285

Compare specifications (specs)