AMD Opteron 43CX EE vs AMD Opteron 43GK HE
Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron 43CX EE and AMD Opteron 43GK HE processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 43CX EE
- Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron 43GK HE
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
- Around 18% higher clock speed: 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Number of cores | 8 vs 4 |
Maximum frequency | 2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz |
L1 cache | 384 KB vs 192 KB |
L2 cache | 8192 KB vs 4096 KB |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Opteron 43CX EE | AMD Opteron 43GK HE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Seoul | Seoul |
Launch date | n/d | n/d |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Vertical segment | Server | Server |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 315 mm | 315 mm |
L1 cache | 192 KB | 384 KB |
L2 cache | 4096 KB | 8192 KB |
L3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) | 8192 KB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 32 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
Transistor count | 1200 million | 1200 million |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
Sockets supported | C32 | C32 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |