AMD Opteron A1120 vs AMD Opteron A1170
Comparative analysis of AMD Opteron A1120 and AMD Opteron A1170 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron A1120
- Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 32 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 32 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Opteron A1170
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
- Around 18% higher clock speed: 2 GHz vs 1.7 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Number of cores | 8 vs 4 |
Maximum frequency | 2 GHz vs 1.7 GHz |
L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) vs 80 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 4096 KB (shared) vs 2048 KB (shared) |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Opteron A1120 | AMD Opteron A1170 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Seattle | Seattle |
Launch date | January 2016 | January 2016 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Vertical segment | Server | Server |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | 4096 KB (shared) |
L3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) | 8192 KB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum frequency | 1.7 GHz | 2 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR3, DDR4 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 32 Watt |
Advanced Technologies |
||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |