AMD PRO A8-8650B vs AMD A10-6700T

Comparative analysis of AMD PRO A8-8650B and AMD A10-6700T processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD PRO A8-8650B

  • Around 11% higher clock speed: 3.9 GHz vs 3.5 GHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm SOI
  • Around 16% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1493 vs 1290
  • Around 40% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3212 vs 2299
  • 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 13.225 vs 4.788
  • Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.052 vs 0.601
  • Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.042 vs 15.083
  • Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 64.844 vs 59.56
Specifications (specs)
Maximum frequency 3.9 GHz vs 3.5 GHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 32 nm SOI
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 1493 vs 1290
PassMark - CPU mark 3212 vs 2299
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 13.225 vs 4.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.052 vs 0.601
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 21.042 vs 15.083
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 64.844 vs 59.56

Reasons to consider the AMD A10-6700T

  • Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • 3.7x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1957 vs 532
  • 2.8x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 4423 vs 1606
  • Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 230.34 vs 219.246
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 1957 vs 532
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 4423 vs 1606
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 230.34 vs 219.246

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD PRO A8-8650B
CPU 2: AMD A10-6700T

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1493
1290
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
3212
2299
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
532
1957
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
1606
4423
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
13.225
4.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
219.246
230.34
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1.052
0.601
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
21.042
15.083
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
64.844
59.56
Name AMD PRO A8-8650B AMD A10-6700T
PassMark - Single thread mark 1493 1290
PassMark - CPU mark 3212 2299
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 532 1957
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1606 4423
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 13.225 4.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 219.246 230.34
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.052 0.601
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 21.042 15.083
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 64.844 59.56

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD PRO A8-8650B AMD A10-6700T

Essentials

Family AMD PRO A-Series Processors AMD A-Series Processors
OPN Tray AD865BYBI44JC AD670TYHA44HL
OS Support Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit
Place in performance rating 1361 1378
Series AMD PRO A-Series A8 APU for Desktops AMD A10-Series APU for Desktops
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop
Architecture codename Richland
Launch date September 2013
OPN PIB AD670TYHHLBOX

Performance

Base frequency 3.2 GHz 2.5 GHz
Compute Cores 10
L2 cache 4 MB 4 MB
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 32 nm SOI
Maximum core temperature 71.30°C 71.30°C
Maximum frequency 3.9 GHz 3.5 GHz
Number of cores 4 4
Number of GPU cores 6
Number of threads 4 4
Unlocked
64 bit support
Die size 246 mm
L1 cache 192 KB
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 71 °C
Transistor count 1178 million

Memory

Max memory channels 2 2
Supported memory frequency 2133 MHz 1866 MHz
Supported memory types DDR3

Graphics

Enduro
Graphics max frequency 757 MHz 720 MHz
iGPU core count 384 384
Processor graphics AMD Radeon R7 Graphics AMD Radeon HD 8650D
Switchable graphics
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Codec Engine (VCE)
Number of pipelines 384

Graphics interfaces

DisplayPort
HDMI

Graphics API support

DirectX 12 11
Vulkan

Compatibility

Configurable TDP 45 Watt/65 Watt
Sockets supported FM2+ FM2
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1

Advanced Technologies

AMD App Acceleration
AMD Elite Experiences
AMD HD3D technology
AMD Mantle API
DualGraphics
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
FreeSync
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)
Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Out-of-band client management
PowerGating
PowerNow
PowerTune
RAID
System Image Stability
TrueAudio
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
VirusProtect

Virtualization

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
IOMMU 2.0

Peripherals

PCI Express revision 2.0