AMD PRO A8-9600 vs AMD A12-9800
Comparative analysis of AMD PRO A8-9600 and AMD A12-9800 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD A12-9800
- CPU is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- Around 24% higher clock speed: 4.2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1674 vs 1513
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3611 vs 3322
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2290 vs 1299
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2365 vs 1377
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8307 vs 4551
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2290 vs 1299
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2365 vs 1377
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8307 vs 4551
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 July 2017 vs 3 October 2016 |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Maximum frequency | 4.2 GHz vs 3.4 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1674 vs 1513 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3611 vs 3322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2290 vs 1299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2365 vs 1377 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8307 vs 4551 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2290 vs 1299 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2365 vs 1377 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8307 vs 4551 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD PRO A8-9600
CPU 2: AMD A12-9800
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD PRO A8-9600 | AMD A12-9800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1513 | 1674 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3322 | 3611 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.191 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 269.509 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.523 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.695 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.399 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1299 | 2290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1377 | 2365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4551 | 8307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1299 | 2290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1377 | 2365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4551 | 8307 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 552 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1679 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD PRO A8-9600 | AMD A12-9800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | AMD A-Series Processors |
Launch date | 3 October 2016 | 27 July 2017 |
OPN Tray | AD960BAGM44AB | AD9800AUM44AB |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit |
Place in performance rating | 1007 | 1020 |
Series | AMD PRO A-Series A8 APU for Desktops | AMD A12-Series APU for Desktops |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | |
OPN PIB | AD9800AUABBOX | |
Price now | $129.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 12.51 | |
Performance |
||
Base frequency | 3.1 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 90°C |
Maximum frequency | 3.4 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Number of GPU cores | 6 | 8 |
Unlocked | ||
64 bit support | ||
Compute Cores | 12 | |
Die size | 246 mm | |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | |
Transistor count | 1178 million | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Supported memory types | DDR4 | |
Graphics |
||
Enduro | ||
Graphics max frequency | 900 MHz | 1108 MHz |
Processor graphics | R7 | Radeon R7 Series |
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
iGPU core count | 8 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | DirectX® 12 |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
Configurable TDP | 45 Watt/65 Watt | |
Sockets supported | AM4 | AM4 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 65 Watt |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Peripherals |
||
PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 x8 |
Max number of PCIe lanes | 8 | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
AMD Secure technology | ||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
FreeSync | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Out-of-band client management | ||
PowerGating | ||
PowerNow | ||
PowerTune | ||
System Image Stability | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
VirusProtect | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
IOMMU 2.0 |