AMD PRO A8-9600B vs AMD A10-5757M

Comparative analysis of AMD PRO A8-9600B and AMD A10-5757M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD PRO A8-9600B

  • CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
  • Around 4% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1194 vs 1151
  • Around 15% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2292 vs 1998
  • Around 17% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 427 vs 365
  • Around 25% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1128 vs 901
  • 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.973 vs 2.665
  • 24.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 231.224 vs 9.416
  • Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.117 vs 0.561
  • Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.579 vs 13.138
  • 25.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 57.356 vs 2.213
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 10/24/2016 vs 23 May 2013
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 32 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 1194 vs 1151
PassMark - CPU mark 2292 vs 1998
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 427 vs 365
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1128 vs 901
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 12.973 vs 2.665
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 231.224 vs 9.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.117 vs 0.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.579 vs 13.138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 57.356 vs 2.213

Reasons to consider the AMD A10-5757M

  • Around 6% higher clock speed: 3.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
  • 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Maximum frequency 3.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
L2 cache 4096 KB vs 2 MB

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD PRO A8-9600B
CPU 2: AMD A10-5757M

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1194
1151
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
2292
1998
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
427
365
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
1128
901
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
12.973
2.665
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
231.224
9.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
1.117
0.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
19.579
13.138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
57.356
2.213
Name AMD PRO A8-9600B AMD A10-5757M
PassMark - Single thread mark 1194 1151
PassMark - CPU mark 2292 1998
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 427 365
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1128 901
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 12.973 2.665
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 231.224 9.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.117 0.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.579 13.138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 57.356 2.213
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 987
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2108
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 7817
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 987
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2108
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 7817

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD PRO A8-9600B AMD A10-5757M

Essentials

Architecture codename Bristol Ridge Richland
Family AMD PRO A-Series Processors
Launch date 10/24/2016 23 May 2013
OPN Tray AM960BADY44AB
OS Support Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit
Place in performance rating 1475 1501
Series AMD PRO A-Series A8 APU for Laptops AMD A-Series
Vertical segment Laptop Laptop

Performance

64 bit support
Base frequency 2.4 GHz
Die size 250 mm 246 mm
L2 cache 2 MB 4096 KB
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 32 nm
Maximum core temperature 90°C
Maximum frequency 3.3 GHz 3.5 GHz
Number of cores 4 4
Number of GPU cores 6
Number of threads 4 4
Transistor count 3100 Million 1178 million
Unlocked
L1 cache 128 KB (per core)
Maximum case temperature (TCase) 71 °C

Memory

Max memory channels 2
Supported memory frequency 1866 MHz
Supported memory types DDR4 DDR3

Graphics

Enduro
Graphics max frequency 720 MHz
iGPU core count 6
Processor graphics R5
Switchable graphics
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Codec Engine (VCE)

Graphics interfaces

DisplayPort
HDMI

Graphics API support

DirectX 12
Vulkan

Compatibility

Configurable TDP 12 Watt/15 Watt
Sockets supported FP4 BGA
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1

Peripherals

Max number of PCIe lanes 8
PCI Express revision 3.0

Advanced Technologies

AMD Secure technology
DualGraphics
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC)
FreeSync
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Out-of-band client management
PowerGating
PowerNow
PowerTune
RAID
System Image Stability
TrueAudio
VirusProtect

Virtualization

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
IOMMU 2.0