AMD PRO A8-9600B vs AMD A10-5757M

Comparative analysis of AMD PRO A8-9600B and AMD A10-5757M processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

AMD PRO A8-9600B

AMD A10-5757M

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD PRO A8-9600B

CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 28 nm vs 32 nm
2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
Around 4% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1194 vs 1151
Around 15% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2292 vs 1998
Around 17% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 427 vs 365
Around 25% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1128 vs 901
4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.973 vs 2.665
24.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 231.224 vs 9.416
Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.117 vs 0.561
Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.579 vs 13.138
25.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 57.356 vs 2.213

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	10/24/2016 vs 23 May 2013
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 32 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 35 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark	1194 vs 1151
PassMark - CPU mark	2292 vs 1998
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	427 vs 365
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	1128 vs 901
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	12.973 vs 2.665
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	231.224 vs 9.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.117 vs 0.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	19.579 vs 13.138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	57.356 vs 2.213

Reasons to consider the AMD A10-5757M

Around 6% higher clock speed: 3.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later

Maximum frequency	3.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
L2 cache	4096 KB vs 2 MB

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD PRO A8-9600B
CPU 2: AMD A10-5757M

PassMark - Single thread mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

1194

1151

PassMark - CPU mark

CPU 1

CPU 2

2292

1998

Geekbench 4 - Single Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

427

365

Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core

CPU 1

CPU 2

1128

901

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

12.973

2.665

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

231.224

9.416

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

1.117

0.561

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

19.579

13.138

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

CPU 1

CPU 2

57.356

2.213

Name	AMD PRO A8-9600B	AMD A10-5757M
PassMark - Single thread mark	1194	1151
PassMark - CPU mark	2292	1998
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	427	365
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	1128	901
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	12.973	2.665
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	231.224	9.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.117	0.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	19.579	13.138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	57.356	2.213
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		987
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		2108
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		7817
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		987
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		2108
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		7817

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD PRO A8-9600B	AMD A10-5757M
Essentials
Architecture codename	Bristol Ridge	Richland
Family	AMD PRO A-Series Processors
Launch date	10/24/2016	23 May 2013
OPN Tray	AM960BADY44AB
OS Support	Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit
Place in performance rating	1476	1502
Series	AMD PRO A-Series A8 APU for Laptops	AMD A-Series
Vertical segment	Laptop	Laptop
Performance
64 bit support
Base frequency	2.4 GHz
Die size	250 mm	246 mm
L2 cache	2 MB	4096 KB
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	32 nm
Maximum core temperature	90°C
Maximum frequency	3.3 GHz	3.5 GHz
Number of cores	4	4
Number of GPU cores	6
Number of threads	4	4
Transistor count	3100 Million	1178 million
Unlocked
L1 cache		128 KB (per core)
Maximum case temperature (TCase)		71 °C
Memory
Max memory channels	2
Supported memory frequency	1866 MHz
Supported memory types	DDR4	DDR3
Graphics
Enduro
Graphics max frequency	720 MHz
iGPU core count	6
Processor graphics	R5
Switchable graphics
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Codec Engine (VCE)
Graphics interfaces
DisplayPort
HDMI
Graphics API support
DirectX	12
Vulkan
Compatibility
Configurable TDP	12 Watt/15 Watt
Sockets supported	FP4	BGA
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	35 Watt
Max number of CPUs in a configuration		1
Peripherals
Max number of PCIe lanes	8
PCI Express revision	3.0
Advanced Technologies
AMD Secure technology
DualGraphics
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC)
FreeSync
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA)
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4)
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX)
Intel® AES New Instructions
Out-of-band client management
PowerGating
PowerNow
PowerTune
RAID
System Image Stability
TrueAudio
VirusProtect
Virtualization
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)
IOMMU 2.0