AMD Phenom II X4 925 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X4 925 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 925
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.67 GHz
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1150 vs 1127
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2277 vs 2187
- Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.088 vs 0.573
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.197 vs 0.177
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | May 2009 vs March 2008 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz vs 2.67 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 256 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1150 vs 1127 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2277 vs 2187 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.088 vs 0.573 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.197 vs 0.177 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450
- 6x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 403 vs 357
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1322 vs 1147
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 31.997 vs 10.457
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.249 vs 3.231
| Specifications (specs) | |
| L2 cache | 12288 KB vs 512 KB (per core) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 403 vs 357 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1322 vs 1147 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 31.997 vs 10.457 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.249 vs 3.231 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X4 925
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Phenom II X4 925 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1150 | 1127 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2277 | 2187 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 357 | 403 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1147 | 1322 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.088 | 0.573 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 10.457 | 31.997 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.197 | 0.177 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.231 | 4.249 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.154 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Phenom II X4 925 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Deneb | Yorkfield |
| Launch date | May 2009 | March 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $160 | |
| Place in performance rating | 2976 | 2980 |
| Price now | $43.99 | $335 |
| Value for money (0-100) | 22.90 | 3.31 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Processor Number | Q9450 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 258 mm | 214 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 12288 KB |
| L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz | 2.67 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 758 million | 820 million |
| Base frequency | 2.66 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 71.4°C | |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | AM3 | LGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||