AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE vs AMD Phenom II X4 840T
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE and AMD Phenom II X4 840T processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
- Around 14% higher clock speed: 3.3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz
- Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1496 vs 1272
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3875 vs 2360
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.711 vs 3.606
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 16.192 vs 9.486
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | December 2010 vs September 2010 |
Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
Number of cores | 6 vs 4 |
Maximum frequency | 3.3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 512 KB (per core) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1496 vs 1272 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3875 vs 2360 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.711 vs 3.606 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.192 vs 9.486 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 840T
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 125 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 840T
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE | AMD Phenom II X4 840T |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1496 | 1272 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 3875 | 2360 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 509 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2230 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.711 | 3.606 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.192 | 9.486 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.182 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.186 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T BE | AMD Phenom II X4 840T | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Thuban | Zosma |
Launch date | December 2010 | September 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 2711 | 2712 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $80 | |
Price now | $69.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.15 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 346 mm | 346 mm |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | 6144 KB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 3.3 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
Number of cores | 6 | 4 |
Transistor count | 904 million | 904 million |
Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | AM3 | AM3 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 95 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |