AMD Phenom X4 9850 (125W) vs Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2220
Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom X4 9850 (125W) and Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2220 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Virtualization, Memory, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom X4 9850 (125W)
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 4% higher clock speed: 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
- 4x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 305 vs 299
- Around 96% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 995 vs 507
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | July 2008 vs March 2008 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.5 GHz vs 2.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 1024 KB (shared) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 305 vs 299 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 995 vs 507 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2220
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 125 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Phenom X4 9850 (125W)
CPU 2: Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2220
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
| Name | AMD Phenom X4 9850 (125W) | Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2220 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 305 | 299 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 995 | 507 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 914 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 855 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.258 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 8.304 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.07 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Phenom X4 9850 (125W) | Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2220 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Agena | Conroe |
| Launch date | July 2008 | March 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 3153 | 3155 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Processor Number | E2220 | |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | |
| Status | Discontinued | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 285 mm | 77 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1024 KB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 2048 KB (shared) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 450 million | 105 million |
| Base frequency | 2.40 GHz | |
| Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | |
| Maximum core temperature | 73.3°C | |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.5V | |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | AM2+ | LGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||