AMD Phenom X4 9850 (125W) vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+

Comparative analysis of AMD Phenom X4 9850 (125W) and AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom X4 9850 (125W)

  • CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 65 nm vs 90 nm
  • 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
  • 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • Around 6% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 305 vs 288
  • Around 94% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 995 vs 514
Specifications (specs)
Launch date July 2008 vs February 2007
Number of cores 4 vs 2
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm vs 90 nm
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) vs 256 KB
L2 cache 512 KB (per core) vs 1024 KB
Benchmarks
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 305 vs 288
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 995 vs 514

Reasons to consider the AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+

  • Around 20% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz
Maximum frequency 3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Phenom X4 9850 (125W)
CPU 2: AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+

Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
305
288
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
995
514
Name AMD Phenom X4 9850 (125W) AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 305 288
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 995 514
PassMark - Single thread mark 1039
PassMark - CPU mark 930
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 1.495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3.655
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.078
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2.013

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Phenom X4 9850 (125W) AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+

Essentials

Architecture codename Agena Windsor
Launch date July 2008 February 2007
Place in performance rating 3144 3147
Vertical segment Desktop Desktop
Price now $32.50
Value for money (0-100) 14.55

Performance

64 bit support
Die size 285 mm 220 mm
L1 cache 128 KB (per core) 256 KB
L2 cache 512 KB (per core) 1024 KB
L3 cache 2048 KB (shared)
Manufacturing process technology 65 nm 90 nm
Maximum frequency 2.5 GHz 3 GHz
Number of cores 4 2
Transistor count 450 million 227 million

Compatibility

Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Sockets supported AM2+ AM2
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 125 Watt 125 Watt

Virtualization

AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™)