AMD RX-427BB vs AMD A12-9700P
Comparative analysis of AMD RX-427BB and AMD A12-9700P processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD RX-427BB
- Around 105782% higher clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 3.4 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.913 vs 2.183
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.185 vs 0.129
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1702 vs 1030
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1809 vs 1596
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5750 vs 4124
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1702 vs 1030
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1809 vs 1596
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5750 vs 4124
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 3600 MHz vs 3.4 GHz |
| L2 cache | 4 MB vs 2 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.913 vs 2.183 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.185 vs 0.129 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1702 vs 1030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1809 vs 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5750 vs 4124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1702 vs 1030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1809 vs 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5750 vs 4124 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A12-9700P
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 8.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 104.395 vs 12.202
- 26.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.759 vs 0.562
- 14.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 50.779 vs 3.551
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 June 2016 vs 20 May 2014 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 104.395 vs 12.202 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.759 vs 0.562 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 50.779 vs 3.551 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD RX-427BB
CPU 2: AMD A12-9700P
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD RX-427BB | AMD A12-9700P |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.913 | 2.183 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 12.202 | 104.395 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.185 | 0.129 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.562 | 14.759 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.551 | 50.779 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1702 | 1030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1809 | 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5750 | 4124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1702 | 1030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1809 | 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5750 | 4124 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1208 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2428 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1934 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4344 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD RX-427BB | AMD A12-9700P | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Bald Eagle | Bristol Ridge |
| Family | AMD R-Series | AMD A-Series Processors |
| Launch date | 20 May 2014 | 1 June 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 1610 | 1506 |
| Processor Number | RX-427BB | |
| Vertical segment | Embedded | Laptop |
| OPN Tray | AM970PADY44AB | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Series | AMD A12-Series APU for Laptops | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2700 MHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Die size | 928 mm2 | 250 mm |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 2 MB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 3600 MHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 4 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
| Transistor count | 3100 Million | |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3-2133 | DDR4 |
| Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 600 MHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 686 MHz | 758 MHz |
| Number of pipelines | 512 | |
| Processor graphics | Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Enduro | ||
| iGPU core count | 6 | |
| Switchable graphics | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 4 | |
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.1 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP | 30-35 Watt | 12-15 Watt |
| Package Size | micro-BGA | |
| Sockets supported | BGA (FP3) | FP4 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 8 |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD RX-427BB with others
AMDRX-427BB vs
IntelCore i7-4710MQ
AMDRX-427BB vs
IntelCore i7-8809G
AMDRX-427BB vs
IntelXeon E5-2648L v4
AMDRX-427BB vs
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 3500U
AMDRX-427BB vs
AMDRyzen Embedded R1305G
AMDRX-427BB vs
AppleA9X
