AMD RX-427BB vs AMD A12-9700P
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD RX-427BB und AMD A12-9700P Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Speicher, Grafik, Grafikschnittstellen, Unterstützung der Grafik-API, Kompatibilität, Peripherien, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD RX-427BB
- Etwa 105782% höhere Taktfrequenz: 3600 MHz vs 3.4 GHz
- 2x mehr L2 Cache, mehr Daten können im L2 Cache gespeichert werden, um später schnell darauf zugreifen zu können
- Etwa 79% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.913 vs 2.183
- Etwa 43% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.185 vs 0.129
- Etwa 65% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1702 vs 1030
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1809 vs 1596
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5750 vs 4124
- Etwa 65% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1702 vs 1030
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1809 vs 1596
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5750 vs 4124
| Spezifikationen | |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3600 MHz vs 3.4 GHz |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB vs 2 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.913 vs 2.183 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.185 vs 0.129 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1702 vs 1030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1809 vs 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5750 vs 4124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1702 vs 1030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1809 vs 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5750 vs 4124 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD A12-9700P
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 0 Monat(e) später
- 2.3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
- 8.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 104.395 vs 12.202
- 26.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.759 vs 0.562
- 14.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 50.779 vs 3.551
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 1 June 2016 vs 20 May 2014 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 104.395 vs 12.202 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.759 vs 0.562 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 50.779 vs 3.551 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: AMD RX-427BB
CPU 2: AMD A12-9700P
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD RX-427BB | AMD A12-9700P |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.913 | 2.183 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 12.202 | 104.395 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.185 | 0.129 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.562 | 14.759 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.551 | 50.779 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1702 | 1030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1809 | 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5750 | 4124 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1702 | 1030 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1809 | 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5750 | 4124 |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1208 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2428 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1934 | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4344 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD RX-427BB | AMD A12-9700P | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur Codename | Bald Eagle | Bristol Ridge |
| Family | AMD R-Series | AMD A-Series Processors |
| Startdatum | 20 May 2014 | 1 June 2016 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1610 | 1505 |
| Processor Number | RX-427BB | |
| Vertikales Segment | Embedded | Laptop |
| OPN Tray | AM970PADY44AB | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
| Serie | AMD A12-Series APU for Laptops | |
Leistung |
||
| 64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
| Base frequency | 2700 MHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Matrizengröße | 928 mm2 | 250 mm |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 2 MB |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale Frequenz | 3600 MHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Anzahl der Adern | 4 | 4 |
| Anzahl der Gewinde | 4 | 4 |
| Maximale Kerntemperatur | 90°C | |
| Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 3100 Million | |
| Freigegeben | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale Speicherkanäle | 2 | 2 |
| Maximale Speicherbandbreite | 34.1 GB/s | |
| Unterstützte Speichertypen | DDR3-2133 | DDR4 |
| Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
Grafik |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 600 MHz | |
| Grafik Maximalfrequenz | 686 MHz | 758 MHz |
| Anzahl der Rohrleitungen | 512 | |
| Prozessorgrafiken | Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
| Enduro | ||
| iGPU Kernzahl | 6 | |
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
Grafikschnittstellen |
||
| Anzahl der unterstützten Anzeigen | 4 | |
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Unterstützung der Grafik-API |
||
| DirectX | 11.1 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Kompatibilität |
||
| Configurable TDP | 30-35 Watt | 12-15 Watt |
| Package Size | micro-BGA | |
| Unterstützte Sockel | BGA (FP3) | FP4 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Peripherien |
||
| Maximale Anzahl von PCIe-Strecken | 16 | 8 |
| PCI Express Revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD HD3D technology | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| AMD Secure technology | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Wählen Sie eine CPU
Prozessoren
Vergleiche AMD RX-427BB mit anderen
AMDRX-427BB vs
IntelCore i7-4710MQ
AMDRX-427BB vs
IntelCore i7-8809G
AMDRX-427BB vs
IntelXeon E5-2648L v4
AMDRX-427BB vs
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 3500U
AMDRX-427BB vs
AMDRyzen Embedded R1305G
AMDRX-427BB vs
AppleA9X
