AMD RX-427BB versus AMD A12-9700P
Analyse comparative des processeurs AMD RX-427BB et AMD A12-9700P pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Soutien des graphiques API, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD RX-427BB
- Environ 105782% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3600 MHz versus 3.4 GHz
- 2x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.913 versus 2.183
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.185 versus 0.129
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1702 versus 1030
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1809 versus 1596
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5750 versus 4124
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1702 versus 1030
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1809 versus 1596
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5750 versus 4124
Caractéristiques | |
Fréquence maximale | 3600 MHz versus 3.4 GHz |
Cache L2 | 4 MB versus 2 MB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.913 versus 2.183 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.185 versus 0.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1702 versus 1030 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1809 versus 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5750 versus 4124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1702 versus 1030 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1809 versus 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5750 versus 4124 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD A12-9700P
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 2 ans 0 mois plus tard
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 35 Watt
- 8.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 104.395 versus 12.202
- 26.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.759 versus 0.562
- 14.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 50.779 versus 3.551
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 June 2016 versus 20 May 2014 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 35 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 104.395 versus 12.202 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.759 versus 0.562 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 50.779 versus 3.551 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: AMD RX-427BB
CPU 2: AMD A12-9700P
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD RX-427BB | AMD A12-9700P |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.913 | 2.183 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 12.202 | 104.395 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.185 | 0.129 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.562 | 14.759 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.551 | 50.779 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1702 | 1030 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1809 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5750 | 4124 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1702 | 1030 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1809 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5750 | 4124 |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1208 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2428 | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1934 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4344 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD RX-427BB | AMD A12-9700P | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Bald Eagle | Bristol Ridge |
Family | AMD R-Series | AMD A-Series Processors |
Date de sortie | 20 May 2014 | 1 June 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1610 | 1505 |
Processor Number | RX-427BB | |
Segment vertical | Embedded | Laptop |
OPN Tray | AM970PADY44AB | |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Série | AMD A12-Series APU for Laptops | |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 2700 MHz | 2.5 GHz |
Taille de dé | 928 mm2 | 250 mm |
Cache L1 | 256 KB | |
Cache L2 | 4 MB | 2 MB |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Fréquence maximale | 3600 MHz | 3.4 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
Nombre de fils | 4 | 4 |
Température de noyau maximale | 90°C | |
Number of GPU cores | 6 | |
Compte de transistor | 3100 Million | |
Ouvert | ||
Mémoire |
||
Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 34.1 GB/s | |
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3-2133 | DDR4 |
Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
Graphiques |
||
Graphics base frequency | 600 MHz | |
Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 686 MHz | 758 MHz |
Nombre de pipelines | 512 | |
Graphiques du processeur | Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics |
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Enduro | ||
Compte de noyaux iGPU | 6 | |
Graphiques changeables | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 4 | |
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien des graphiques API |
||
DirectX | 11.1 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibilité |
||
Configurable TDP | 30-35 Watt | 12-15 Watt |
Package Size | micro-BGA | |
Prise courants soutenu | BGA (FP3) | FP4 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | 8 |
Révision PCI Express | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Technologies élevé |
||
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 3 (FMA3) | ||
Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
AMD App Acceleration | ||
AMD HD3D technology | ||
AMD Mantle API | ||
AMD Secure technology | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Frame Rate Target Control (FRTC) | ||
FreeSync | ||
Fused Multiply-Add (FMA) | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) |