AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U vs Intel Core i5-4570
Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U and Intel Core i5-4570 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Security & Reliability. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 4 more threads: 8 vs 4
- Around 31% higher maximum core temperature: 95°C vs 72.72°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 84 Watt
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 6637 vs 5238
- 7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.516 vs 3.626
- 5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 376.268 vs 74.525
- 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.115 vs 0.434
- 15.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.83 vs 2.048
- 18.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 101.686 vs 5.537
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1569 vs 1143
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5962 vs 3326
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1569 vs 1143
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5962 vs 3326
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 January 2018 vs June 2013 |
Number of threads | 8 vs 4 |
Maximum core temperature | 95°C vs 72.72°C |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
L1 cache | 384 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB vs 256 KB (per core) |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 84 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 6637 vs 5238 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.516 vs 3.626 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 376.268 vs 74.525 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.115 vs 0.434 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.83 vs 2.048 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.686 vs 5.537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1569 vs 1143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5962 vs 3326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1569 vs 1143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5962 vs 3326 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-4570
- Around 50% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2033 vs 1793
- Around 22% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 861 vs 704
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2767 vs 2503
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2080 vs 1744
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2080 vs 1744
Specifications (specs) | |
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) vs 4 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 2033 vs 1793 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 861 vs 704 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2767 vs 2503 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2080 vs 1744 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2080 vs 1744 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
CPU 2: Intel Core i5-4570
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U | Intel Core i5-4570 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1793 | 2033 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 6637 | 5238 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 704 | 861 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2503 | 2767 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.516 | 3.626 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 376.268 | 74.525 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.115 | 0.434 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.83 | 2.048 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 101.686 | 5.537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1569 | 1143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1744 | 2080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5962 | 3326 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1569 | 1143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1744 | 2080 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5962 | 3326 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2833 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U | Intel Core i5-4570 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Zen | Haswell |
Family | AMD Ryzen PRO Processors | |
Launch date | 10 January 2018 | June 2013 |
OPN Tray | YM250BC4T4MFB | |
OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Place in performance rating | 800 | 1797 |
Series | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO Mobile Processors with Radeon Vega Graphics | 4th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $221 | |
Price now | $174.99 | |
Processor Number | i5-4570 | |
Status | Discontinued | |
Value for money (0-100) | 11.99 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2 GHz | 3.20 GHz |
Die size | 246 mm | 177 mm |
L1 cache | 384 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 4 MB | 6144 KB (shared) |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 95°C | 72.72°C |
Maximum frequency | 3.6 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Number of GPU cores | 8 | |
Number of threads | 8 | 4 |
Transistor count | 4500 Million | 1400 million |
Unlocked | ||
Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
Memory |
||
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Supported memory frequency | 2400 MHz | |
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | |
Graphics |
||
Graphics max frequency | 1100 MHz | 1.15 GHz |
iGPU core count | 8 | |
Processor graphics | Radeon Vega 8 Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 4600 |
Device ID | 0x412 | |
Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.15 GHz | |
Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
Max video memory | 2 GB | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
eDP | ||
Number of displays supported | 3 | |
VGA | ||
Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
Configurable TDP | 12-25 Watt | |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Sockets supported | FP5 | FCLGA1150 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 84 Watt |
Thermal Solution | Not included | PCG 2013D |
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
Peripherals |
||
PCI Express revision | 3.0 | Up to 3.0 |
Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
Scalability | 1S Only | |
Advanced Technologies |
||
AMD SenseMI | ||
Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
The "Zen" Core Architecture | ||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
Idle States | ||
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | |
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Intel® TSX-NI | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
Max resolution over eDP | 3840x2160@60Hz | |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
Max resolution over VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
DirectX | 11.2/12 | |
OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
Anti-Theft technology | ||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
Intel® OS Guard | ||
Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) |