AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 vs AMD A10-9700

Comparative analysis of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and AMD A10-9700 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600

• CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
• Around 3% higher clock speed: 3.9 GHz vs 3.8 GHz
• Around 6% higher maximum core temperature: 95°C vs 90°C
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
• Around 40% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2269 vs 1615
• 3.8x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 13465 vs 3546

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
CPU 2: AMD A10-9700

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	2269 1615
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	13465 3546

Compare specifications (specs)